Welcome to Part B - "Following the Science", a "Back and Forth" with data from the field and data from government science advisors and policy makers.
Part B is further divided into sections with the Introduction and Table of Contents included in the PDF download linked to the image to the left.
Document 5 introduces a number of key paradigm-shifting Covid-19 related findings of early to mid 2021 (including that spike protein generated by the vaccine is actually HARMFUL, just as harmful as the spike protein in a genuine COVID-19 infection).
Document 6 provides a recent update and further explanations.
Documents 7 to 9 look into the references listed by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta, which in turn are based on references provided by Alberta's Scientific Advisory Group.
Click on the image to download Documents #5-9 AND DISCOVER PLENTY OF SCIENCE 'FROZEN IN TIME'!!
Click on the image to download Documents 10 to 13.
Document 10 looks at "Quick Links to Trusted Resources" on the government-funded CanCOVID platform and compares the results with those on the same topic available on PubMED and other relevant data sources.
Similarly, Document 11 looks at bureaucratic and other limitations that could possibly explain how government policy makers can (unbeknownst to them ?) be presented with OUTDATED information aka "Science Frozen in Time."
Document 12 demonstrates what appears to be a complete lack of awareness of these key findings on the part of COVID-19 related policy makers in June 2021.
Document 13 demonstrates the same issue as late as September 2021.
Click on the image to download Documents 14 to 16.
Many employers and leaders of organizations are referring to the desire to "do our part" to combat rising Covid-19 case counts. However, those looking behind the published case count data have identified a number of questionable "irregularities" precisely with the ways in which this case count data is being gathered and reported. The facts that vaccine injuries also drive case counts (and that safe & effective treatments are being withheld, and that statistical data is being presented in a misleading fashion, to the detriment of the medical system) are also not reported at all.
Document 14 asks someone who reports data provided by official sources to go a little deeper. Document 15 directs many of these questions to Alberta Health Operations. (No response 6 weeks later.) Document 16 questions specific choices made in the presentation of data on the CanCOVID website.
Two Alberta professors as well as a coalition of medical professionals from the Okanagan lay out the facts around the lack of safety, efficacy and necessity of COVID-19 vaccination.
Document 17 is a letter to the College of Physicians & Surgeons of Alberta written by pediatric neurologist Dr. Eric Payne. Dr. Payne has a busy specialty medical practice, and teaches at the University of Calgary.
Document 18 is an article by University of Alberta adjunct professor in the School of Public Health, Dr. Warren Kindzierski.
Document 19 entails two letters written to the Chief Medical Officer of Health of British Columbia. All letters contain many more references to current scientific findings than the latest documents by the Scientific Advisory Group which advises the government of Alberta and by the National Advisory Council on Immunization.
University of British Columbia professor Dr. Steven Pelech's letter to members of the UBC Senate can be downloaded by clicking on the image to the left. In addition to his teaching and research work, Dr. Pelech is one of the founders, the VP and the chair of the Scientific and Medical Advisory Committee of the Canadian Covid Care Alliance (www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org), which is a
group of over (now) 500 members across Canada that are primarily research scientists, medical doctors and other health practitioners as well as lawyers. This volunteer organization has over 15
committees that are highly engaged in reviewing and assessing the scientific literature, records from government health authorities and vaccine manufacturers related to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID19. In his letter to the UBC Senate members, Dr. Pelech explains the development of highly sensitive serological tests for the detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Results point to a very high degree of immunity within the public, which makes continued vaccination not only unnecessary but also harmful.
Here, we present more professors who discuss the data that so contradicts what we are all being told. Document 21 is a letter addressing the UBC's plans to treat and test vaccinated and unvaccinated persons differently. The letter writer expresses the hope that once decision makers have been provided with recent scientific findings, their subsequent policy decisions can actually reflect these findings. Dr. Alexander and Dr. Tenenbaum show how the products currently in use do NOT meet the criteria for vaccines (22). Harvard Medical School professor (biostatistician and epidemiologist in the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics), Dr. Kulldorff shows how natural immunity overrides the rationale for vaccine passports (23). Harvard professor of Population Health, Dr. Subramanian discusses the LACK of a correlation between vaccination rates and rates of disease, stating "The sole reliance on vaccination as a primary strategy to mitigate COVID-19 and its adverse consequences needs
to be re-examined." (24)
A Nursing Student highlights the contradictions between what universities teach and what they are currently practicing. (See Document 25, click on the image to download.) Document 26 presents information that could form a notice of Conscientious Objection to the requirement to provide vaccination services. Prior to April, 2021 it was already known that no case counts, etc. that are based on RT-PCR testing can be considered reliable UNTIL cycle counts are standardized at 28 or fewer. (Document 27). Sadly half a year later, this standardization has not yet occurred, so all case count reports are still suspect. Document 28 is a pre-print book chapter by Dr. Sukharit Bhakdi & Dr. Karina Reiss, who illustrate processes around spike protein induced endothelial damage already well known in May 2021. (28) No policy recommendations should be made without an awareness of this information.
Part B "Following the Science" ends with the conclusion that was evident for many already six months ago. In their Risk/Benefit Analysis, Doctors for Covid Ethics stated "the available evidence and science indicate that COVID-19 vaccines are unnecessary, ineffective and unsafe." (Document 29) This was echoed worldwide by many other scientists (30) and more recently by US Army Flight Surgeon Lieutenant Colonel Theresa Long, MD, MPH, FS (31). Finally, the Canadian Covid Care Alliance shares information speaking against vaccination specifically of children and teenagers (32).